X6M Competition 4.4T xDrive vs Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
250 km/h
/
/
4
/
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
4941 mm
4950 mm
2019 mm
1930 mm
1693 mm
1730 mm
2933 mm
2850 mm
580 L
/
/
5 Doors
Fuel Economy
9 Km/L
20 Km/L
85 L
65 L
9 Km/L
20 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Interior
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
Transmission
/
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
4.4 L
2.5 L - 2.5 L
555 BHP - 617 BHP
240 - 240
Automatic
CVT & Electronically controlled Continuously Variable Transmission (ECVT)
Petrol
Hybrid
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
7 - 7
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
4.4 L
2.5 L
Gasoline
Hybrid
617 BHP
240 BHP
750 Nm
237 Nm
/
In-Line
/
None
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
X6M Competition 4.4T xDrive
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD)
- Rear Camera
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickHighlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose X6M Competition 4.4T xDrive if you care more about interior space; choose Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) if you care more about fuel economy.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, X6M Competition 4.4T xDrive has a fuel consumption of 11.11, while Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) has a fuel consumption of 5. Therefore, Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, X6M Competition 4.4T xDrive has a wheelbase of 2933 mm, while Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) has a wheelbase of 2850 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, X6M Competition 4.4T xDrive, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. X6M Competition 4.4T xDrive uses All Wheel Drive, while Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) uses All Wheel Drive.