X7 XDrive40i vs EQS 450 SUV 4MATIC Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
245 km/h
260 km/h
/
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
5151 mm
5125 mm
2000 mm
2157 mm
1805 mm
1718 mm
3105 mm
3210 mm
326 L
645 L
/
5 Doors
Fuel Economy
11.1 Km/L
/
83 L
/
11.1 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
/
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
Infotainment
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
3.0 L - 4.4 L
/
340 BHP - 530 BHP
357 BHP - 650
Automatic
1-speed direct drive (EV) & Automatic & Single-speed automatic & Single-speed automatic (EV)
Gasoline & Petrol
Electric
TBD
/
5 Seater - 7 Seater
5 - 7 Seater
/
TBD
/
485 km - 700 km
Exterior
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
3.0 L
/
Gasoline
Electric
340 BHP
357 BHP
450 Nm
800 Nm
Motor
/
10
/
options.Lithium-ion
/
265 kW
Comparison of configuration highlights
X7 XDrive40i
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
EQS 450 SUV 4MATIC
- Remote key types
Review Comparison
Positive
- High comfort and spacious space
- Advanced technologies for intelligent interactions
- Powerful and dynamic engine performance
Negative
- High purchase cost
- High fuel expense
- Complexity in technical systems for beginners
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickX7 XDrive40i
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose X7 XDrive40i if you care more about price; choose EQS 450 SUV 4MATIC if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, X7 XDrive40i has a fuel consumption of 9.01, while EQS 450 SUV 4MATIC has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, X7 XDrive40i has a wheelbase of 3105 mm, while EQS 450 SUV 4MATIC has a wheelbase of 3210 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, EQS 450 SUV 4MATIC, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. X7 XDrive40i uses All Wheel Drive, while EQS 450 SUV 4MATIC uses All Wheel Drive.