CarteaCompare CarsX7 XDrive40i vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2018 6.2L Trackhawk (707 HP)

X7 XDrive40i vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2018 6.2L Trackhawk (707 HP) Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

245 km/h

290

/

8

Dimensions

5 Seater

5 Seater

5151 mm

4822

2000 mm

1943

1805 mm

1778

3105 mm

2914

326 L

782

Fuel Economy

11.1 Km/L

5.6

83 L

93

11.1 Km/L

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

Driver Seat

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Transmission

Automatic

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

All Wheel Drive

All Wheel Drive

/

/

Key Spec

3.0 L - 4.4 L

3.6 L - 6.4 L

340 BHP - 530 BHP

286 BHP - 707 BHP

Automatic

8AT & Automatic

Gasoline & Petrol

Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

5 Seater - 7 Seater

5 - 7

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

3.0 L

6.2 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

340 BHP

707 BHP

450 Nm

875

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • X7 XDrive40i

    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Rear Camera
    • ABS
  • Jeep Grand Cherokee 2018 6.2L Trackhawk (707 HP)

    • Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
    • Electronic Engine Immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree Camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear AC Controls
    • Push Button Start
    • Temperature Display
    • Keyless Entry
    • Welcome Light
    • Rear Camera
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Advanced Air Bags System (AABS)
    • Acceleration Skid Control
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Knee Bag - Driver
    • Crash Auto Door Unlock
    • Auto Door Lock
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Active braking
    • Lane Departure Warning

Review Comparison

Positive

  • High comfort and spacious space
  • Advanced technologies for intelligent interactions
  • Powerful and dynamic engine performance

Negative

  • High purchase cost
  • High fuel expense
  • Complexity in technical systems for beginners

Positive

  • Versatility of options for powerful engines
  • Impressive off-road driving capabilities
  • High-end interior, equipped with modern technologies

Negative

  • High fuel consumption for some models
  • High price compared to some competitors
  • Large size, difficult to maneuver in confined spaces

Related comparisons

Editor's PickJeep Grand Cherokee 2018 6.2L Trackhawk (707 HP)

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose X7 XDrive40i if you care more about fuel economy; choose Jeep Grand Cherokee 2018 6.2L Trackhawk (707 HP) if you care more about price.

Popular Car Comparisons

BMW | X7 XDrive40i

VS

Maserati | Maserati Levante 2023 3.0T V6 Modena

BMW | X7 XDrive40i

VS

Jaguar | F Pace 5.0L V8 SVR (550 PS)

BMW | X7 XDrive40i

VS

Porsche | Porsche Cayenne Coupe 2024 S E-Hybrid Platinum Edition

BMW | X7 XDrive40i

VS

Jeep | Jeep Grand Cherokee 2018 6.2L Trackhawk (707 HP)

BMW | X7 XDrive40i

VS

BMW | BMW X5M 2019 4.4T xDrive

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, X7 XDrive40i has a fuel consumption of 9.01, while Jeep Grand Cherokee 2018 6.2L Trackhawk (707 HP) has a fuel consumption of 17.86. Therefore, X7 XDrive40i is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, X7 XDrive40i has a wheelbase of 3105 mm, while Jeep Grand Cherokee 2018 6.2L Trackhawk (707 HP) has a wheelbase of 2914. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, X7 XDrive40i, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. X7 XDrive40i uses All Wheel Drive, while Jeep Grand Cherokee 2018 6.2L Trackhawk (707 HP) uses All Wheel Drive.