X7 XDrive40i vs Range Rover SE P360 3.0L Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
245 km/h
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
5151 mm
/
2000 mm
/
1805 mm
/
3105 mm
/
326 L
/
Fuel Economy
11.1 Km/L
8.5
83 L
/
11.1 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
/
Key Spec
3.0 L - 4.4 L
3.0 L - 5.0 L
340 BHP - 530 BHP
360 BHP - 525 BHP
Automatic
Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
5 Seater - 7 Seater
4 Seater - 5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
Engine
3.0 L
3.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
340 BHP
360 BHP
450 Nm
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
X7 XDrive40i
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Range Rover SE P360 3.0L
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickX7 XDrive40i
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose X7 XDrive40i if you care more about price; choose Range Rover SE P360 3.0L if you care more about power.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, X7 XDrive40i has a fuel consumption of 9.01, while Range Rover SE P360 3.0L has a fuel consumption of 11.76. Therefore, X7 XDrive40i is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, X7 XDrive40i has a wheelbase of 3105 mm, while Range Rover SE P360 3.0L has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. X7 XDrive40i uses All Wheel Drive, while Range Rover SE P360 3.0L uses No data.