X7 xDriveM50i vs F Pace 2.0T SE (250 ps) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
250 km/h
217 km/h
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
5151 mm
4746 mm
2000 mm
2070 mm
1805 mm
1664 mm
3105 mm
2874 mm
326 L
650 L
Fuel Economy
8.8 Km/L
13.5 Km/L
83 L
63 L
8.8 Km/L
13.5 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Safety
✓
✓
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
3.0 L - 4.4 L
2.0 L - 5.0 L
340 BHP - 530 BHP
246 BHP - 550 BHP
Automatic
Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater - 7 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
Engine
4.4 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
530 BHP
246 BHP
750 Nm
365 Nm
Comparison of configuration highlights
X7 xDriveM50i
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
F Pace 2.0T SE (250 ps)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickF Pace 2.0T SE (250 ps)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose X7 xDriveM50i if you care more about interior space; choose F Pace 2.0T SE (250 ps) if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, X7 xDriveM50i has a fuel consumption of 11.36, while F Pace 2.0T SE (250 ps) has a fuel consumption of 7.41. Therefore, F Pace 2.0T SE (250 ps) is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, X7 xDriveM50i has a wheelbase of 3105 mm, while F Pace 2.0T SE (250 ps) has a wheelbase of 2874 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, X7 xDriveM50i, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. X7 xDriveM50i uses All Wheel Drive, while F Pace 2.0T SE (250 ps) uses All Wheel Drive.