X7 xDriveM50i vs Grand Wagoneer Series III 3.0T Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
250 km/h
220 km/h
/
6
/
3000 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
5151 mm
5758 mm
2000 mm
2123 mm
1805 mm
1920 mm
3105 mm
3302 mm
326 L
1251 L
/
5 Doors
/
254 m
Fuel Economy
8.8 Km/L
6 Km/L
83 L
115 L
8.8 Km/L
6 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
4-Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
12
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
19
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Key Spec
3.0 L - 4.4 L
3.0 L
340 BHP - 530 BHP
510 BHP
Automatic
TBD
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
5 Seater - 7 Seater
7 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
4.4 L
3.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
530 BHP
510 BHP
750 Nm
678 Nm
/
In-Line
/
Twin Turbo
/
4
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
X7 xDriveM50i
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Grand Wagoneer Series III 3.0T
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickGrand Wagoneer Series III 3.0T
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose X7 xDriveM50i if you care more about fuel economy; choose Grand Wagoneer Series III 3.0T if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, X7 xDriveM50i has a fuel consumption of 11.36, while Grand Wagoneer Series III 3.0T has a fuel consumption of 16.67. Therefore, X7 xDriveM50i is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, X7 xDriveM50i has a wheelbase of 3105 mm, while Grand Wagoneer Series III 3.0T has a wheelbase of 3302 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Grand Wagoneer Series III 3.0T, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. X7 xDriveM50i uses All Wheel Drive, while Grand Wagoneer Series III 3.0T uses Four Wheel Drive.