X7 xDriveM50i vs Tiggo 2 Pro Comfort Comparison
Car Information
SUV
/
Engine / Motor
250 km/h
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
5151 mm
4200
2000 mm
1760
1805 mm
1570
3105 mm
2555
326 L
341
/
Flush Door
/
16
/
5
Fuel Economy
8.8 Km/L
/
83 L
/
8.8 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Manual
Interior
/
Front Row Seats
/
Cloth
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Dual Front Airbags
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
10.25
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
4
Transmission
Automatic
CVT
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Front Drive
Wheels/brakes
/
215/60 R17
/
215/60 R17
Key Spec
3.0 L - 4.4 L
1.5 L - 1.5 L
340 BHP - 530 BHP
109 BHP - 113
Automatic
Automatic & CVT
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
/
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
4.4 L
1.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
530 BHP
111 BHP
750 Nm
/
/
1.5L
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
ECO, Normal
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
X7 xDriveM50i
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Tiggo 2 Pro Comfort
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Keyless Start
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickTiggo 2 Pro Comfort
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose X7 xDriveM50i if you care more about interior space; choose Tiggo 2 Pro Comfort if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, X7 xDriveM50i has a fuel consumption of 11.36, while Tiggo 2 Pro Comfort has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, X7 xDriveM50i has a wheelbase of 3105 mm, while Tiggo 2 Pro Comfort has a wheelbase of 2555. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, X7 xDriveM50i, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. X7 xDriveM50i uses All Wheel Drive, while Tiggo 2 Pro Comfort uses Front Drive.