X90 1.5T M/T vs RX Comfort 2.0T Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
185 km/h
4
4
1462 cc
1998 cc
GCC
Chinese
Dimensions
7 Seater
5 Seater
5 Doors
5 Doors
4840 mm
4781 mm
1925 mm
1920 mm
1745 mm
1671 mm
2850 mm
2815 mm
510 L
500 L
210 mm
187 m
Fuel Economy
12 Km/L
16 Km/L
57 L
50 L
12 Km/L
16 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Smart Entry
Smart Entry
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
Fabric
Leather
Digital
Digital
Dual Zone
Dual Zone
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Electric
Electric
✓
✓
✓
✓
Standard
Standard
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Infotainment
12.3
12.3
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Android LCD
Android LCD
✓
✓
8
8
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
1.5 L - 1.6 L
2.0 L - 2.0 L
145 BHP - 197 BHP
245 HP - 261 BHP
Automatic
7DCT & 8AT & Automatic
Gasoline
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
7 Seater
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
LED with Halogen
LED
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
In-Line
1.5 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Twin Turbo
Twin Turbo
4
4
197 BHP
261 BHP
290 Nm
400 Nm
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
X90 1.5T M/T
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
RX Comfort 2.0T
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose X90 1.5T M/T if you care more about price; choose RX Comfort 2.0T if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, X90 1.5T M/T has a fuel consumption of 8.33, while RX Comfort 2.0T has a fuel consumption of 6.25. Therefore, RX Comfort 2.0T is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, X90 1.5T M/T has a wheelbase of 2850 mm, while RX Comfort 2.0T has a wheelbase of 2815 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, X90 1.5T M/T, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. X90 1.5T M/T uses Front Wheel Drive, while RX Comfort 2.0T uses Front Wheel Drive.