X90 Plus 2.0T Comfort vs Lynk & Co 01 2023 2.0T Hyper Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

200 km/h

210

4

4

1998 cc

/

Chinese

/

Dimensions

7

5

18

/

5 Doors

/

4838

4549

1914

1860

1775

1689

2830

2734

510 L

/

210 mm

/

Fuel Economy

12 Km/L

14.9

57 L

/

12 Km/L

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Entry

/

Interior

/

/

Leather

/

Digital

/

Dual Zone

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

/

Standard

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

6

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

12.3

/

/

/

/

Android LCD

/

/

8

/

/

/

/

Transmission

/

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

Front Wheel Drive

Front Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

/

Key Spec

1.6 L - 2.0 L

2.0 L

197 - 254

216 BHP

7DCT & Automatic

Automatic

Gasoline & Petrol

Petrol

TBD

TBD

7 - 7

5 Seater

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

In-Line

/

2.0 L

2.0 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

Twin Turbo

/

4

/

254

216 BHP

390 Nm

325

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • X90 Plus 2.0T Comfort

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear Power Outlet
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Number of Airbags
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking
  • Lynk & Co 01 2023 2.0T Hyper

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Pedestrian airbag
    • Fire Extinguisher
    • Door Edge Protector
    • Active Understeer Control (AUC)
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Auto Door Lock
    • Spare Wheel
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Active braking
    • Lane Departure Warning

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickLynk & Co 01 2023 2.0T Hyper

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose X90 Plus 2.0T Comfort if you care more about interior space; choose Lynk & Co 01 2023 2.0T Hyper if you care more about fuel economy.

Popular Car Comparisons

Jetour | X90 Plus 2.0T Comfort

VS

GMC | GMC Terrain 2022 1.5T AT4

Jetour | X90 Plus 2.0T Comfort

VS

Honda | Honda CRV 2018 EX Plus (AWD)

Jetour | X90 Plus 2.0T Comfort

VS

Changan | CS75 PLUS SPORT

Jetour | X90 Plus 2.0T Comfort

VS

GMC | Terrain 2025 Elevation

Jetour | X90 Plus 2.0T Comfort

VS

Toyota | Toyota Innova 2024 2.0L GL (8 Seater)

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, X90 Plus 2.0T Comfort has a fuel consumption of 8.33, while Lynk & Co 01 2023 2.0T Hyper has a fuel consumption of 6.71. Therefore, Lynk & Co 01 2023 2.0T Hyper is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, X90 Plus 2.0T Comfort has a wheelbase of 2830, while Lynk & Co 01 2023 2.0T Hyper has a wheelbase of 2734. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, X90 Plus 2.0T Comfort, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. X90 Plus 2.0T Comfort uses Front Wheel Drive, while Lynk & Co 01 2023 2.0T Hyper uses Front Wheel Drive.