X90 Plus 2.0T Comfort vs AITO 9- 5 seater Comparison

Car Information

/

4.9

/

225km WLTP / 228km NEDC

/

52

Engine / Motor

200 km/h

/

4

/

1998 cc

/

Chinese

/

Dimensions

7

5

18

22"

5 Doors

5

4838

5230

1914

1999

1775

1800

2830

3110

510 L

/

210 mm

/

Fuel Economy

12 Km/L

/

57 L

65L

12 Km/L

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Entry

/

/

Interior

Front Row Seats

Front Row Seats

/

Leather

/

Digital

/

Dual Zone

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

/

Standard

/

/

Front Row Seats

/

15.6

/

/

Front Row Seats

/

Front Row Seats

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

6

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

12.3

16

/

/

Android LCD

/

/

8

23

/

Transmission

/

AT

Chassis & Steering

Front Wheel Drive

Four-Wheel Drive

/

Intelligent air suspension

Key Spec

1.6 L - 2.0 L

1.5L

197 - 254

496 hp

7DCT & Automatic

AT

Gasoline & Petrol

Hybrid

TBD

TBD

7 - 7

5

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

Galaxy

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

Engine

In-Line

/

2.0 L

1.5L

Gasoline

Hybrid

Twin Turbo

/

4

/

254

496 hp

390 Nm

675Front:315/Rear:360

/

365Front:165/Rear:200

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

192 Laser LiDRA + 3 Millimeter-wave radar

/

12 Ultrasonic radar + 7 High perception camera + 4 Surround view camera

/

/

Motor

/

365Front:165/Rear:200

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • X90 Plus 2.0T Comfort

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear Power Outlet
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Number of Airbags
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking
  • AITO 9- 5 seater

    Review Comparison

    Positive

    • No data found

    Negative

    • No data found

    Positive

    • No data found

    Negative

    • No data found

    Related comparisons

    Editor's PickAITO 9- 5 seater

    Expert / Editor Recommendation

    Choose X90 Plus 2.0T Comfort if you care more about overall equipment; choose AITO 9- 5 seater if you care more about price.

    Popular Car Comparisons

    Jetour | X90 Plus 2.0T Comfort

    VS

    Honda | HR-V DX

    Jetour | X90 Plus 2.0T Comfort

    VS

    Jetour | X90 Plus 2.0T Comfort

    Jetour | X90 Plus 2.0T Comfort

    VS

    Toyota | RAV4 LE 4X2 HEV

    Jetour | X90 Plus 2.0T Comfort

    VS

    Jetour | Dashing LUX 1.5T

    Jetour | X90 Plus 2.0T Comfort

    VS

    Jetour | T1 Comfort 2026

    Q&A

    • According to fuel consumption data, X90 Plus 2.0T Comfort has a fuel consumption of 8.33, while AITO 9- 5 seater has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
    • In terms of interior space, X90 Plus 2.0T Comfort has a wheelbase of 2830, while AITO 9- 5 seater has a wheelbase of 3110. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, AITO 9- 5 seater , offers more room.
    • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. X90 Plus 2.0T Comfort uses Front Wheel Drive, while AITO 9- 5 seater uses Four-Wheel Drive.