X90 Plus 2.0T Comfort vs Omoda C7 Comfort Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
/
4
/
1998 cc
/
Chinese
/
Dimensions
7
5
18
19"
5 Doors
/
4838
4660
1914
1875
1775
1670
2830
2720
510 L
/
210 mm
176
/
1578
Fuel Economy
12 Km/L
13.3
57 L
51
12 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
√
/
✓
Interior
✓
Front Row Seats
✓
Front Row Seats
✓
/
Leather
√
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
/
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
15.6"
/
✓
/
✓
/
8.88"
/
√
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
Dual
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
6
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
√
✓
√
✓
√
✓
/
✓
√
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
√
/
✓
/
√
/
✓
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
Infotainment
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
✓
✓
✓
8
8
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
/
7DCT
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
/
/
Macpherson Strut
/
Multilink
Wheels/brakes
/
Ventilated Disk
/
Ventilated Disk
/
Disk
/
235/50 R19
/
235/50 R19
Key Spec
1.6 L - 2.0 L
/
197 - 254
/
7DCT & Automatic
/
Gasoline & Petrol
/
TBD
/
7 - 7
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
كهربائي
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
2.0 L
1.6
Gasoline
Gasoline
Twin Turbo
/
4
/
254
195 HP
390 Nm
290
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
ECO / NORMAL / SPORT
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
X90 Plus 2.0T Comfort
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Omoda C7 Comfort
- Power Tailgate
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Steering Adjustment
- Emergency Lane Keeping (ELK）
- Rear Cross Traffic Alert
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Knee Bag - Driver
- Spare Wheel
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
- Seat belt reminder
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose X90 Plus 2.0T Comfort if you care more about interior space; choose Omoda C7 Comfort if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, X90 Plus 2.0T Comfort has a fuel consumption of 8.33, while Omoda C7 Comfort has a fuel consumption of 7.52. Therefore, Omoda C7 Comfort is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, X90 Plus 2.0T Comfort has a wheelbase of 2830, while Omoda C7 Comfort has a wheelbase of 2720. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, X90 Plus 2.0T Comfort, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. X90 Plus 2.0T Comfort uses Front Wheel Drive, while Omoda C7 Comfort uses No data.