X90 Plus 2.0T Comfort vs Omoda C7 Comfort Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

200 km/h

/

4

/

1998 cc

/

Chinese

/

Dimensions

7

5

18

19"

5 Doors

/

4838

4660

1914

1875

1775

1670

2830

2720

510 L

/

210 mm

176

/

1578

Fuel Economy

12 Km/L

13.3

57 L

51

12 Km/L

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Entry

/

/

Interior

Front Row Seats

Front Row Seats

/

Leather

Digital

/

Dual Zone

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

/

Standard

/

/

/

Front Row Seats

/

15.6"

/

/

/

8.88"

/

/

Front Row Seats

/

/

Dual

/

/

/

/

Safety

6

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

12.3

/

/

/

/

Android LCD

8

8

/

/

Transmission

/

7DCT

Chassis & Steering

Front Wheel Drive

/

/

Macpherson Strut

/

Multilink

Wheels/brakes

/

Ventilated Disk

/

Ventilated Disk

/

Disk

/

235/50 R19

/

235/50 R19

Key Spec

1.6 L - 2.0 L

-

197 - 254

195 HP - 341 HP

7DCT & Automatic

7DCT & DHT

Gasoline & Petrol

Gasoline & Hybrid

TBD

TBD

7 - 7

5

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

/

/

/

كهربائي

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

In-Line

/

2.0 L

1.6

Gasoline

Gasoline

Twin Turbo

/

4

/

254

195 HP

390 Nm

290

Technologies

/

/

ECO / NORMAL / SPORT

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • X90 Plus 2.0T Comfort

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear Power Outlet
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Number of Airbags
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking
  • Omoda C7 Comfort

    • Power Tailgate
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Emergency Lane Keeping (ELK)
    • Rear Cross Traffic Alert
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Knee Bag - Driver
    • Spare Wheel
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
    • Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Lane Departure Warning
    • Lane Keeping Assist
    • Seat belt reminder

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickOmoda C7 Comfort

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose X90 Plus 2.0T Comfort if you care more about interior space; choose Omoda C7 Comfort if you care more about price.

Popular Car Comparisons

Jetour | X90 Plus 2.0T Comfort

VS

Haval | Dargo 2.0T Adventure (4WD)

Jetour | X90 Plus 2.0T Comfort

VS

Subaru | OUTBACK 2.5i S AWD

Jetour | X90 Plus 2.0T Comfort

VS

Peugeot | 5008 1.6T Active Plus

Jetour | X90 Plus 2.0T Comfort

VS

Peugeot | 5008 1.6T Allure plus

Jetour | X90 Plus 2.0T Comfort

VS

Peugeot | Peugeot 408 2024 1.6T Allure

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, X90 Plus 2.0T Comfort has a fuel consumption of 8.33, while Omoda C7 Comfort has a fuel consumption of 7.52. Therefore, Omoda C7 Comfort is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, X90 Plus 2.0T Comfort has a wheelbase of 2830, while Omoda C7 Comfort has a wheelbase of 2720. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, X90 Plus 2.0T Comfort, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. X90 Plus 2.0T Comfort uses Front Wheel Drive, while Omoda C7 Comfort uses No data.