X90 Plus 2.0T Comfort vs Optima 2025 Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

200 km/h

/

4

/

1998 cc

/

Chinese

/

Dimensions

7

5 Seater

18

18

5 Doors

/

4838

4905

1914

1860

1775

1445

2830

2850

510 L

510

210 mm

/

Fuel Economy

12 Km/L

/

57 L

/

12 Km/L

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Entry

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

Leather

/

Digital

/

Dual Zone

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

/

Standard

/

Safety

/

6

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

12.3

/

/

/

/

Android LCD

/

/

8

/

Transmission

/

AT

Chassis & Steering

Front Wheel Drive

/

Wheels/brakes

/

Disc

/

Disc

/

235/45 R18

/

235/45 R18

Key Spec

1.6 L - 2.0 L

2.0 L - 2.5 L

197 - 254

157 BHP - 265 BHP

7DCT & Automatic

AT & Automatic

Gasoline & Petrol

Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

7 - 7

5 Seater

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

In-Line

/

2.0 L

2.5 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

Twin Turbo

/

4

/

254

194 BHP

390 Nm

/

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • X90 Plus 2.0T Comfort

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear Power Outlet
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Number of Airbags
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking
  • Optima 2025

    Review Comparison

    Positive

    • No data found

    Negative

    • No data found

    Positive

    • No data found

    Negative

    • No data found

    Related comparisons

    Editor's PickOptima 2025

    Expert / Editor Recommendation

    Choose X90 Plus 2.0T Comfort if you care more about power; choose Optima 2025 if you care more about price.

    Popular Car Comparisons

    Jetour | X90 Plus 2.0T Comfort

    VS

    Haval | Dargo 2.0T Adventure (4WD)

    Jetour | X90 Plus 2.0T Comfort

    VS

    Subaru | OUTBACK 2.5i S AWD

    Jetour | X90 Plus 2.0T Comfort

    VS

    Peugeot | 5008 1.6T Active Plus

    Jetour | X90 Plus 2.0T Comfort

    VS

    Peugeot | 5008 1.6T Allure plus

    Jetour | X90 Plus 2.0T Comfort

    VS

    Peugeot | Peugeot 408 2024 1.6T Allure

    Q&A

    • According to fuel consumption data, X90 Plus 2.0T Comfort has a fuel consumption of 8.33, while Optima 2025 has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
    • In terms of interior space, X90 Plus 2.0T Comfort has a wheelbase of 2830, while Optima 2025 has a wheelbase of 2850. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Optima 2025, offers more room.
    • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. X90 Plus 2.0T Comfort uses Front Wheel Drive, while Optima 2025 uses No data.