XC40 2.0T T4 FWD Momentum vs IM Motors IM 6 BEV Ultra AWD Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
230 km/h
252
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
4425 mm
4937
1910 mm
1988
1652 mm
1671
2702 mm
2980
460 L
617–1,833 L
/
2385
/
20"
Fuel Economy
13.9 Km/L
/
54 L
/
13.9 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
/
Front and Back Row Seats
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Battery/Charging
/
/
/
30–80% in around 17 min
Transmission
/
1-speed automatic / fixed-ratio EV gearbox
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Four-Wheel Drive
/
✓
/
AWD
/
Double wishbone independent suspension
/
Multi-link independent suspension
Wheels/brakes
/
Ventilated discs
/
Ventilated discs
/
235/50 R20
/
235/50 R20
Exterior
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0 L
/
Gasoline
Electric
190 BHP
671
300 Nm
800
Motor
/
Ternary NMC
Technologies
/
3
/
12
/
1
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
XC40 2.0T T4 FWD Momentum
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
IM Motors IM 6 BEV Ultra AWD
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree Camera
- Emergency Lane Keeping (ELK）
- Rear Cross Traffic Alert
- Child Safety Monitoring System
- Lane Following Assist
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Child Lock
- Active braking
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
- Seat belt reminder
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickIM Motors IM 6 BEV Ultra AWD
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose XC40 2.0T T4 FWD Momentum if you care more about overall equipment; choose IM Motors IM 6 BEV Ultra AWD if you care more about interior space.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, XC40 2.0T T4 FWD Momentum has a fuel consumption of 7.19, while IM Motors IM 6 BEV Ultra AWD has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, XC40 2.0T T4 FWD Momentum has a wheelbase of 2702 mm, while IM Motors IM 6 BEV Ultra AWD has a wheelbase of 2980. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, IM Motors IM 6 BEV Ultra AWD, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. XC40 2.0T T4 FWD Momentum uses Front Wheel Drive, while IM Motors IM 6 BEV Ultra AWD uses Four-Wheel Drive.