XC40 2.0T T4 FWD Momentum vs Kodiaq 1.4 TSI Ambition (7-seater) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
230 km/h
194 km/h
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
4425 mm
4697 mm
1910 mm
1882 mm
1652 mm
1681 mm
2702 mm
2791 mm
460 L
650 L
Fuel Economy
13.9 Km/L
14.1 Km/L
54 L
60 L
13.9 Km/L
14.1 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Safety
✓
✓
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0 L
1.4 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
190 BHP
150 BHP
300 Nm
250 Nm
Comparison of configuration highlights
XC40 2.0T T4 FWD Momentum
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Kodiaq 1.4 TSI Ambition (7-seater)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickKodiaq 1.4 TSI Ambition (7-seater)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose XC40 2.0T T4 FWD Momentum if you care more about power; choose Kodiaq 1.4 TSI Ambition (7-seater) if you care more about fuel economy.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, XC40 2.0T T4 FWD Momentum has a fuel consumption of 7.19, while Kodiaq 1.4 TSI Ambition (7-seater) has a fuel consumption of 7.09. Therefore, Kodiaq 1.4 TSI Ambition (7-seater) is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, XC40 2.0T T4 FWD Momentum has a wheelbase of 2702 mm, while Kodiaq 1.4 TSI Ambition (7-seater) has a wheelbase of 2791 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Kodiaq 1.4 TSI Ambition (7-seater), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. XC40 2.0T T4 FWD Momentum uses Front Wheel Drive, while Kodiaq 1.4 TSI Ambition (7-seater) uses Front Wheel Drive.