XC40 2.0T T4 R Design vs Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
230 km/h
/
/
4
/
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
4425 mm
4950 mm
1910 mm
1930 mm
1652 mm
1730 mm
2702 mm
2850 mm
460 L
/
/
5 Doors
Fuel Economy
13.9 Km/L
20 Km/L
54 L
65 L
13.9 Km/L
20 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Safety
✓
/
Transmission
/
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.0 L
2.5 L - 2.5 L
190 BHP
240 BHP - 240 BHP
TBD
Automatic & CVT & eCVT & Electronically controlled Continuously Variable Transmission (ECVT)
Gasoline
Hybrid & Hybrid
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
7 Seater - 7 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0 L
2.5 L
Gasoline
Hybrid
190 BHP
240 BHP
300 Nm
237 Nm
/
In-Line
/
None
/
4
Comparison of configuration highlights
XC40 2.0T T4 R Design
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD)
- Rear Camera
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickHighlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose XC40 2.0T T4 R Design if you care more about overall equipment; choose Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, XC40 2.0T T4 R Design has a fuel consumption of 7.19, while Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) has a fuel consumption of 5. Therefore, Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, XC40 2.0T T4 R Design has a wheelbase of 2702 mm, while Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) has a wheelbase of 2850 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. XC40 2.0T T4 R Design uses Front Wheel Drive, while Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) uses All Wheel Drive.