XC40 2.0T T4 R Design vs Q3 Sportback 40 TFSI S Line 2.0L FWD Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

230 km/h

206 km/h

/

4

/

1984 cc

/

GCC

Dimensions

5 Seater

5 Seater

4425 mm

4485 mm

1910 mm

1856 mm

1652 mm

1585 mm

2702 mm

2680 mm

460 L

530 L

/

5 Doors

/

170 m

Fuel Economy

13.9 Km/L

11 Km/L

54 L

60 L

13.9 Km/L

11 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Entry

/

Interior

/

/

/

Leather

/

Digital

/

Dual Zone

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

Standard

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

9

/

/

/

/

Android LCD

/

/

6

Chassis & Steering

Front Wheel Drive

Front Wheel Drive

Key Spec

2.0 L

1.4 L - 2.0 L

190 BHP

150 BHP - 180 BHP

TBD

TBD

Gasoline

Gasoline

TBD

TBD

5 Seater

5 Seater

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

/

Engine

2.0 L

2.0 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

190 BHP

180 BHP

300 Nm

320 Nm

/

In-Line

/

Single Turbo

/

4

Technologies

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • XC40 2.0T T4 R Design

    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Rear Camera
    • ABS
  • Q3 Sportback 40 TFSI S Line 2.0L FWD

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • Rear Defogger
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickXC40 2.0T T4 R Design

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose XC40 2.0T T4 R Design if you care more about price; choose Q3 Sportback 40 TFSI S Line 2.0L FWD if you care more about overall equipment.

Popular Car Comparisons

Volvo | XC40 2.0T T4 R Design

VS

Jeep | Grand Cherokee 3.6L Laredo

Volvo | XC40 2.0T T4 R Design

VS

Hyundai | Hyundai Palisade 2022 3.8L GDi (AWD) Premium (7 Seats)

Volvo | XC40 2.0T T4 R Design

VS

Tesla | Model Y Rear-Wheel Drive

Volvo | XC40 2.0T T4 R Design

VS

Tesla | Tesla Model Y 2023 Standard Range

Volvo | XC40 2.0T T4 R Design

VS

Tesla | Tesla Model Y 2024 Standard Range

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, XC40 2.0T T4 R Design has a fuel consumption of 7.19, while Q3 Sportback 40 TFSI S Line 2.0L FWD has a fuel consumption of 9.09. Therefore, XC40 2.0T T4 R Design is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, XC40 2.0T T4 R Design has a wheelbase of 2702 mm, while Q3 Sportback 40 TFSI S Line 2.0L FWD has a wheelbase of 2680 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, XC40 2.0T T4 R Design, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. XC40 2.0T T4 R Design uses Front Wheel Drive, while Q3 Sportback 40 TFSI S Line 2.0L FWD uses Front Wheel Drive.