XC90 2.0T B6 MHEV Inscription AWD (7-seater) vs X5M Competition 4.4T xDrive Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
180 km/h
250 km/h
Dimensions
7 Seater
5 Seater
4953 mm
4938 mm
2140 mm
2015 mm
1775 mm
1748 mm
2985 mm
2933 mm
314 L
650 L
Fuel Economy
13.5 Km/L
9 Km/L
71 L
85 L
13.5 Km/L
9 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
Safety
✓
✓
Transmission
/
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.0 L
4.4 L
249 BHP - 300 BHP
575 BHP - 617 BHP
TBD
Automatic
Gasoline & Hybrid
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
7 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Engine
2.0 L
4.4 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
300 BHP
617 BHP
420 Nm
750 Nm
Technologies
✓
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
XC90 2.0T B6 MHEV Inscription AWD (7-seater)
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
X5M Competition 4.4T xDrive
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickX5M Competition 4.4T xDrive
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose XC90 2.0T B6 MHEV Inscription AWD (7-seater) if you care more about fuel economy; choose X5M Competition 4.4T xDrive if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, XC90 2.0T B6 MHEV Inscription AWD (7-seater) has a fuel consumption of 7.41, while X5M Competition 4.4T xDrive has a fuel consumption of 11.11. Therefore, XC90 2.0T B6 MHEV Inscription AWD (7-seater) is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, XC90 2.0T B6 MHEV Inscription AWD (7-seater) has a wheelbase of 2985 mm, while X5M Competition 4.4T xDrive has a wheelbase of 2933 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, XC90 2.0T B6 MHEV Inscription AWD (7-seater), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. XC90 2.0T B6 MHEV Inscription AWD (7-seater) uses All Wheel Drive, while X5M Competition 4.4T xDrive uses All Wheel Drive.