Xforce GT CVT vs Atto 3 Premium Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
160 km/h
/
Chinese
Dimensions
5
5
4390
4455 mm
1810
2050 mm
1660
1615 mm
2650
2720 mm
/
215/55R18
/
5 Doors
/
440 L
/
205 mm
Fuel Economy
/
/
42
/
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
Interior
12.3
5
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
LCD
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Single
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
✓
/
6
/
Front
RCW
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
Automatic Anti-Glare
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
6
8
/
12.8”Electric Rotary Multimedia Screen
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
✓
Battery/Charging
/
AC (7KW) DC (80KW)
Transmission
CVT
DHT
Chassis & Steering
/
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
225/50 R18
/
225/50 R18
/
Key Spec
1.5
/
105 BHP
201 BHP
CVT
AT & DHT
Gasoline
Electric
TBD
/
5
5 - 5
/
TBD
/
420 km
Exterior
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5
/
Gasoline
Electric
105 BHP
201 BHP
141
310 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Motor
/
9
/
BYD Blade Battery (LFP)
Comparison of configuration highlights
Xforce GT CVT
- Rear Cross Traffic Alert
- Number of Airbags
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
Atto 3 Premium
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree Camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Lane Following Assist
- Electric anti-dazzling room mirror
- Collision Detection
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Xforce GT CVT if you care more about price; choose Atto 3 Premium if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Xforce GT CVT has a fuel consumption of No data, while Atto 3 Premium has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Xforce GT CVT has a wheelbase of 2650, while Atto 3 Premium has a wheelbase of 2720 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Atto 3 Premium, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Xforce GT CVT uses No data, while Atto 3 Premium uses Front Wheel Drive.