Xforce GT CVT vs Audi Q2 2017 Audi Q2 2017 30 TFSI Basic (116 HP) Comparison

Car Information

/

10.5

/

Engine / Motor

/

190

/

3

Dimensions

5

5 Seater

4390

4.191

1810

1.794

1660

1.508

2650

2.601

/

405

Fuel Economy

/

22.7

42

50

Comfort

/

/

/

/

Interior

12.3

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

6

Front

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

6

/

/

/

/

Transmission

CVT

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

/

Front Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

225/50 R18

/

225/50 R18

/

Key Spec

1.5

1.0 L - 1.4 L

105 BHP

116 BHP - 150 BHP

CVT

Automatic

Gasoline

Petrol

TBD

TBD

5

5 Seater

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

1.5

1.0 L

Gasoline

Petrol

105 BHP

116 BHP

141

200

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Xforce GT CVT

    • Rear Cross Traffic Alert
    • Number of Airbags
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
  • Audi Q2 2017 Audi Q2 2017 30 TFSI Basic (116 HP)

    • Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
    • Electronic Engine Immobilizer
    • Welcome Light
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Number of Airbags
    • Advanced Air Bags System (AABS)
    • Speed Limiter
    • Auto Door Lock
    • Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
    • Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • ABS
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickAudi Q2 2017 Audi Q2 2017 30 TFSI Basic (116 HP)

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Xforce GT CVT if you care more about interior space; choose Audi Q2 2017 Audi Q2 2017 30 TFSI Basic (116 HP) if you care more about price.

Popular Car Comparisons

Mitsubishi | Xforce GT CVT

VS

Honda | Honda HRV 2021 1.8 i-VTEC EX

Mitsubishi | Xforce GT CVT

VS

Honda | Honda CRV 2021 DX (2WD)

Mitsubishi | Xforce GT CVT

VS

Honda | Honda CRV 2019 DX (2WD)

Mitsubishi | Xforce GT CVT

VS

Chevrolet | Chevrolet Captiva 2024 1.5T Premier

Mitsubishi | Xforce GT CVT

VS

Peugeot | Peugeot 3008 2021 1.6T Active

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Xforce GT CVT has a fuel consumption of No data, while Audi Q2 2017 Audi Q2 2017 30 TFSI Basic (116 HP) has a fuel consumption of 4.41. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Xforce GT CVT has a wheelbase of 2650, while Audi Q2 2017 Audi Q2 2017 30 TFSI Basic (116 HP) has a wheelbase of 2.601. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Xforce GT CVT, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Xforce GT CVT uses No data, while Audi Q2 2017 Audi Q2 2017 30 TFSI Basic (116 HP) uses Front Wheel Drive.