Xforce GT CVT vs Coolray 2025 GL Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
200 km/h
/
4
/
1477 cc
/
Chinese
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
4390
4380 mm
1810
1810 mm
1660
1615 mm
2650
2600 mm
/
17
/
4 Doors
/
330 L
/
180 mm
Fuel Economy
/
16 Km/L
42
45 L
/
16 Km/L
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
Interior
12.3
10.25
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
✓
/
Single
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Bucket
Safety
✓
/
6
/
Front
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
6
6
/
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
Transmission
CVT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
/
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
225/50 R18
/
225/50 R18
/
Key Spec
1.5
1.5 L - 1.5 L
105 BHP
171 BHP - 177 BHP
CVT
7DCT & Automatic & Manual
Gasoline
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5
1.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
105 BHP
172 BHP
141
290 Nm
/
In-Line
/
Single Turbo
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Xforce GT CVT
- Rear Cross Traffic Alert
- Number of Airbags
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
Coolray 2025 GL
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Welcome Light
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Sporty and attractive exterior design
- Smart and versatile technical equipment
- Dynamic performance suitable for City and Highway
Negative
- Interior materials need improvement
- The space of the rear seats is limited
- Sound insulation at high speeds is insufficient
Related comparisons
Editor's PickCoolray 2025 GL
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Xforce GT CVT if you care more about interior space; choose Coolray 2025 GL if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Xforce GT CVT has a fuel consumption of No data, while Coolray 2025 GL has a fuel consumption of 6.25. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Xforce GT CVT has a wheelbase of 2650, while Coolray 2025 GL has a wheelbase of 2600 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Xforce GT CVT, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Xforce GT CVT uses No data, while Coolray 2025 GL uses Front Wheel Drive.