Xforce GT CVT vs CS75 PLUS SPORT Comparison

Car Information

Dimensions

5

5

4390

4700

1810

1865

1660

1710

2650

2710

Fuel Economy

/

/

42

58

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Key

Interior

12.3

12

/

/

/

/

Front Row Seats

/

Front Row Seats

/

LCD

/

Driver Seat

/

Leather

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

6

6

Front

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

6

8

/

12

/

/

SONY

Transmission

CVT

8-Speed Automatic

/

8

Chassis & Steering

/

Front Drive

Wheels/brakes

225/50 R18

225/55 R19

225/50 R18

225/55 R19

Key Spec

1.5

2.0 L

105 BHP

229 BHP - 233 BHP

CVT

8-Speed Automatic

Gasoline

Gasoline

TBD

TBD

5

5

Exterior

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

Engine

1.5

2.0 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

105 BHP

233 BHP

141

390

/

2.0T GDI

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

Normal, Economy

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Xforce GT CVT

    • Rear Cross Traffic Alert
    • Number of Airbags
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
  • CS75 PLUS SPORT

    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree Camera
    • Cool Box
    • Push Button Start
    • Keyless Entry
    • Welcome Light
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Keyless Start
    • Remote key types
    • Rear Cross Traffic Alert
    • Number of Airbags
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
    • Lane Departure Warning
    • Lane Keeping Assist

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickXforce GT CVT

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Xforce GT CVT if you care more about price; choose CS75 PLUS SPORT if you care more about interior space.

Popular Car Comparisons

Mitsubishi | Xforce GT CVT

VS

Honda | Honda HRV 2021 1.8 i-VTEC EX

Mitsubishi | Xforce GT CVT

VS

Honda | Honda CRV 2021 DX (2WD)

Mitsubishi | Xforce GT CVT

VS

Honda | Honda CRV 2019 DX (2WD)

Mitsubishi | Xforce GT CVT

VS

Chevrolet | Chevrolet Captiva 2024 1.5T Premier

Mitsubishi | Xforce GT CVT

VS

Peugeot | Peugeot 3008 2021 1.6T Active

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Xforce GT CVT has a fuel consumption of No data, while CS75 PLUS SPORT has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Xforce GT CVT has a wheelbase of 2650, while CS75 PLUS SPORT has a wheelbase of 2710. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, CS75 PLUS SPORT, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Xforce GT CVT uses No data, while CS75 PLUS SPORT uses Front Drive.