Xforce GT CVT vs CX5 Entry Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
210 km/h
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
4390
4550
1810
1840
1660
1675
2650
2700
/
17
/
965
Fuel Economy
/
/
42
56
/
/
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
6
6
Front
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
6
/
/
✓
Transmission
CVT
6-Speed Automatic
Chassis & Steering
/
Front Drive
Wheels/brakes
225/50 R18
/
225/50 R18
/
Key Spec
1.5
1.9 L - 2.5 L
105 BHP
151 BHP - 188 BHP
CVT
6 Sp Skyactiv with Sports Mode & 6 Speed Skyactiv with Sports+Offroad Mode & Automatic
Gasoline
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5
2.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
105 BHP
190 BHP
141
251 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Xforce GT CVT
- Rear Cross Traffic Alert
- Number of Airbags
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
CX5 Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Rear Camera
- Number of Airbags
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickXforce GT CVT
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Xforce GT CVT if you care more about price; choose CX5 Entry if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Xforce GT CVT has a fuel consumption of No data, while CX5 Entry has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Xforce GT CVT has a wheelbase of 2650, while CX5 Entry has a wheelbase of 2700. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, CX5 Entry, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Xforce GT CVT uses No data, while CX5 Entry uses Front Drive.