Xforce GT CVT vs GS3 1.3T GB Comparison
Car Information
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
4390
4350 mm
1810
1825 mm
1660
1680 mm
2650
2560 mm
/
370 L
Fuel Economy
/
13.3 Km/L
42
50 L
/
13.3 Km/L
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
6
/
Front
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
6
/
Transmission
CVT
/
Chassis & Steering
/
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
225/50 R18
/
225/50 R18
/
Key Spec
1.5
1.3 L - 1.5 L
105 BHP
172 BHP - 202 BHP
CVT
7DCT & Automatic & DCT
Gasoline
Petrol & Gasoline
TBD
TBD
5
5 Seater - 5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
1.5
1.3 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
105 BHP
202 BHP
141
137 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Xforce GT CVT
- Rear Cross Traffic Alert
- Number of Airbags
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
GS3 1.3T GB
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickGS3 1.3T GB
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Xforce GT CVT if you care more about interior space; choose GS3 1.3T GB if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Xforce GT CVT has a fuel consumption of No data, while GS3 1.3T GB has a fuel consumption of 7.52. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Xforce GT CVT has a wheelbase of 2650, while GS3 1.3T GB has a wheelbase of 2560 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Xforce GT CVT, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Xforce GT CVT uses No data, while GS3 1.3T GB uses Front Wheel Drive.