Xforce GT CVT vs GS4 1.5T GB Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
180 km/h
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
4390
4545 mm
1810
1856 mm
1660
1668 mm
2650
2680 mm
/
470 L
Fuel Economy
/
14.7 Km/L
42
55 L
/
14.7 Km/L
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
6
/
Front
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
6
/
Transmission
CVT
/
Chassis & Steering
/
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
225/50 R18
/
225/50 R18
/
Key Spec
1.5
1.5 L
105 BHP
165 BHP
CVT
TBD
Gasoline
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
5
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5
1.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
105 BHP
165 BHP
141
265 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Xforce GT CVT
- Rear Cross Traffic Alert
- Number of Airbags
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
GS4 1.5T GB
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickXforce GT CVT
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Xforce GT CVT if you care more about price; choose GS4 1.5T GB if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Xforce GT CVT has a fuel consumption of No data, while GS4 1.5T GB has a fuel consumption of 6.8. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Xforce GT CVT has a wheelbase of 2650, while GS4 1.5T GB has a wheelbase of 2680 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, GS4 1.5T GB, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Xforce GT CVT uses No data, while GS4 1.5T GB uses Front Wheel Drive.