Xforce GT CVT vs Song Plus AWD Comparison

Car Information

/

5.9

/

128 KM

/

18.3

Engine / Motor

/

180

Dimensions

5

5

4390

4775

1810

1890

1660

1680

2650

2765

/

Flush Door

/

1975

/

19

/

5

/

574

Fuel Economy

/

19.8

42

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

Manual

Interior

12.3

12.3

/

/

/

Front Row Seats

/

/

/

Front Row Seats

/

Front Row Seats

/

LCD

/

Sensatec Leather

/

Dual

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

6

Driver's and Passenger airbags, Front-row side airbag, Integrated side air curtains

Front

Front and Rear

/

/

/

4x Front Sensor, 4x Rear Sensor

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

All Seats

Infotainment

/

6

10

/

15.6-inch rotating screen

/

/

/

/

Infinity

Battery/Charging

/

6.6

Transmission

CVT

AT

Chassis & Steering

/

Four-Wheel Drive

/

MacPherson

/

Multi- link(5 links)

Wheels/brakes

225/50 R18

235/50 R19

225/50 R18

235/50 R19

/

VENTILATED DISC

/

DISC

Key Spec

1.5

1.5 L - 1.5 L

105 BHP

197 BHP - 360 BHP

CVT

AT & Automatic

Gasoline

Hybrid

TBD

TBD

5

5 - 5

Exterior

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

1.5

1.5 L

Gasoline

Hybrid

105 BHP

360 BHP

141

596

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

Sport, Ordinary, Economical, Sand and Mud Terrain Mode

/

Motor

/

596

/

Lithium iron phosphate battery

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Xforce GT CVT

    • Rear Cross Traffic Alert
    • Number of Airbags
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
  • Song Plus AWD

    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree Camera
    • Keyless Entry
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Rear Cross Traffic Alert
    • Number of Airbags
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Child Lock
    • Active braking
    • Lane Departure Warning
    • Lane Keeping Assist
    • Seat belt reminder

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickSong Plus AWD

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Xforce GT CVT if you care more about overall equipment; choose Song Plus AWD if you care more about price.

Popular Car Comparisons

Mitsubishi | Xforce GT CVT

VS

Geely | EX5 Pro

Mitsubishi | Xforce GT CVT

VS

Hongqi | HS3 1.5T Luxury

Mitsubishi | Xforce GT CVT

VS

Peugeot | 2008 GT

Mitsubishi | Xforce GT CVT

VS

JAC | JS6 Flagship

Mitsubishi | Xforce GT CVT

VS

Jetour | X70 Plus Luxury 1.6T

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Xforce GT CVT has a fuel consumption of No data, while Song Plus AWD has a fuel consumption of 5.05. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Xforce GT CVT has a wheelbase of 2650, while Song Plus AWD has a wheelbase of 2765. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Song Plus AWD, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Xforce GT CVT uses No data, while Song Plus AWD uses Four-Wheel Drive.