Xpander Cross High Line vs CX3 2.0L GT (FWD) Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

1499cc

/

/

190 km/h

Dimensions

7

5 Seater

4,595

4275 mm

1,790

1765 mm

1,750

1535 mm

2,775

2570 mm

/

240 L

Fuel Economy

45

48 L

/

15.4 Km/L

/

15.4 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

Driver Seat

/

High-grade fabric,Synthetic leather

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

2

/

T135/90D16

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

6

/

Transmission

4AT

/

Chassis & Steering

Front Drive

All Wheel Drive

MacPherson strut

/

Torsion beam

/

Wheels/brakes

/

/

Ventilated Disc

/

Drum

/

205/55R17

/

205/55R17

/

Key Spec

1.5

2.0 L - 2.0 L

105

145 BHP - 148 BHP

4AT

6 Speed SkyActiv with Sports Mode & Automatic

Gasoline

Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

7

5 - 5

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

1.5

2.0 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

105

148 BHP

141

192 Nm

4000rpm

/

Technologies

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Xpander Cross High Line

    • Electronic Engine Immobilizer
    • Cool Box
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear AC Controls
    • Welcome Light
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Number of Airbags
    • Spare Wheel
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • Child Lock
  • CX3 2.0L GT (FWD)

    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • ABS

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickXpander Cross High Line

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Xpander Cross High Line if you care more about price; choose CX3 2.0L GT (FWD) if you care more about power.

Popular Car Comparisons

Mitsubishi | Xpander Cross High Line

VS

Haval | H2 1.5T Intelligent

Mitsubishi | Xpander Cross High Line

VS

Hongqi | EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD)

Mitsubishi | Xpander Cross High Line

VS

Hongqi | EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD)

Mitsubishi | Xpander Cross High Line

VS

Sandstorm | Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4)

Mitsubishi | Xpander Cross High Line

VS

Geely | GS Sport 1.8L Classic

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Xpander Cross High Line has a fuel consumption of No data, while CX3 2.0L GT (FWD) has a fuel consumption of 6.49. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Xpander Cross High Line has a wheelbase of 2,775, while CX3 2.0L GT (FWD) has a wheelbase of 2570 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Xpander Cross High Line, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Xpander Cross High Line uses Front Drive, while CX3 2.0L GT (FWD) uses All Wheel Drive.