Xpander Medium Line vs Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
170
161 km/h
1499cc
/
Dimensions
7
5 Seater
4475mm
4341 mm
1750mm
1804 mm
1700mm
1693 mm
2775mm
2676 mm
220
/
/
414 L
Fuel Economy
45
50 L
/
17.2 Km/L
/
17.2 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
Driver Seat
/
Fabric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
2
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
4
/
Chassis & Steering
MacPherson strut
/
Torsion beam
/
/
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
Ventilated Disc
/
Drum
/
195/65R16
/
195/65R16
/
Key Spec
1.5 L
1.6 L - 2.0 L
105 BHP
105 BHP - 135 BHP
Automatic
Automatic & CVT & Manual
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
7 Seater
5 - 5
Exterior
كهربائي
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
1.5
1.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
105
115 BHP
141
156 Nm
4000rpm
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Xpander Medium Line
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Security System
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- Child Lock
Duster 1.6L PE (4x2)
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickDuster 1.6L PE (4x2)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Xpander Medium Line if you care more about interior space; choose Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) if you care more about overall equipment.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Xpander Medium Line has a fuel consumption of No data, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) has a fuel consumption of 5.81. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Xpander Medium Line has a wheelbase of 2775mm, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) has a wheelbase of 2676 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Xpander Medium Line, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Xpander Medium Line uses No data, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) uses Front Wheel Drive.