XTerra 2.5L SE (2WD) vs Atto 3 Premium Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
160 km/h
4
/
2490 cc
/
GCC
Chinese
Dimensions
7 Seater
5
5 Doors
5 Doors
4900 mm
4455 mm
1865 mm
2050 mm
1865 mm
1615 mm
2850 mm
2720 mm
/
215/55R18
/
440 L
/
205 mm
Fuel Economy
78 L
/
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
Interior
✓
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
5
/
✓
/
LCD
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Single
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Automatic Anti-Glare
/
RCW
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
12.8”Electric Rotary Multimedia Screen
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
8
Battery/Charging
/
AC (7KW) DC (80KW)
Transmission
Automatic
DHT
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.5 L - 4.0 L
/
165 BHP - 261 BHP
201 BHP
Automatic
AT & DHT
Gasoline & Petrol
Electric
TBD
/
5 Seater - 7 Seater
5 - 5
/
TBD
/
420 km
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
2.5 L
/
Gasoline
Electric
None
/
4
/
165 BHP
201 BHP
241 Nm
310 Nm
Technologies
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Motor
/
9
/
BYD Blade Battery (LFP)
Comparison of configuration highlights
XTerra 2.5L SE (2WD)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Atto 3 Premium
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree Camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Lane Following Assist
- Electric anti-dazzling room mirror
- Collision Detection
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
Review Comparison
Positive
- Strong off-road performance
- Practical and comfortable interior design
- Wide load capacity
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- Limited technological equipment
- The quality of the cabin materials is average
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose XTerra 2.5L SE (2WD) if you care more about interior space; choose Atto 3 Premium if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, XTerra 2.5L SE (2WD) has a fuel consumption of No data, while Atto 3 Premium has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, XTerra 2.5L SE (2WD) has a wheelbase of 2850 mm, while Atto 3 Premium has a wheelbase of 2720 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, XTerra 2.5L SE (2WD), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. XTerra 2.5L SE (2WD) uses Front Wheel Drive, while Atto 3 Premium uses Front Wheel Drive.