XTerra 2.5L SE (2WD) vs ZS 1.5L STD Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
170
4
/
2490 cc
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
7 Seater
5 Seater
5 Doors
5
4900 mm
4323
1865 mm
1809
1865 mm
1653
2850 mm
2585
/
1318
/
17
/
359/1166
/
145
Fuel Economy
78 L
45
/
17.2
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Key
/
Manual
Interior
✓
/
/
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
Fabric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
/
Drivers and Passenger Airbag
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
10.1
/
✓
/
✓
/
4
Transmission
Automatic
CVT
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Drive
/
McPherson Front Shock Absorber
/
H Torsional Beam
Wheels/brakes
/
Disc
/
Disc
/
215/55 R17
/
215/55 R17
Key Spec
2.5 L - 4.0 L
1.3 L - 1.5 L
165 BHP - 261 BHP
112 BHP - 168
Automatic
6AT & Automatic & CVT
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater - 7 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
2.5 L
1.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
None
/
4
/
165 BHP
118 BHP
241 Nm
180
/
88
Technologies
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
XTerra 2.5L SE (2WD)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
ZS 1.5L STD
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Push Button Start
- Parking sensor rear
- Rear Camera
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Number of Airbags
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
Review Comparison
Positive
- Strong off-road performance
- Practical and comfortable interior design
- Wide load capacity
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- Limited technological equipment
- The quality of the cabin materials is average
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Economical fuel consumption
- Competitive price compared to specifications
Negative
- Average interior material quality
- Engine performance is limited by power
- The lack of some advanced security systems
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose XTerra 2.5L SE (2WD) if you care more about interior space; choose ZS 1.5L STD if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, XTerra 2.5L SE (2WD) has a fuel consumption of No data, while ZS 1.5L STD has a fuel consumption of 5.81. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, XTerra 2.5L SE (2WD) has a wheelbase of 2850 mm, while ZS 1.5L STD has a wheelbase of 2585. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, XTerra 2.5L SE (2WD), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. XTerra 2.5L SE (2WD) uses Front Wheel Drive, while ZS 1.5L STD uses Front Drive.