XTerra 2.5L Titanium (2WD) vs EcoSport 1.5 Trend Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
170 km/h
4
/
2490 cc
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
7 Seater
5 Seater
5 Doors
/
4900 mm
3998 mm
1865 mm
1765 mm
1865 mm
1645 mm
2850 mm
2521 mm
/
346 L
Fuel Economy
78 L
52 L
/
16.4 Km/L
/
16.4 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
Safety
✓
✓
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.5 L - 4.0 L
1.5 L
165 BHP - 261 BHP
120 BHP
Automatic
TBD
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
5 Seater - 7 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Engine
In-Line
/
2.5 L
1.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
None
/
4
/
165 BHP
120 BHP
241 Nm
151 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
XTerra 2.5L Titanium (2WD)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
EcoSport 1.5 Trend
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- Strong off-road performance
- Practical and comfortable interior design
- Wide load capacity
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- Limited technological equipment
- The quality of the cabin materials is average
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickEcoSport 1.5 Trend
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose XTerra 2.5L Titanium (2WD) if you care more about interior space; choose EcoSport 1.5 Trend if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, XTerra 2.5L Titanium (2WD) has a fuel consumption of No data, while EcoSport 1.5 Trend has a fuel consumption of 6.1. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, XTerra 2.5L Titanium (2WD) has a wheelbase of 2850 mm, while EcoSport 1.5 Trend has a wheelbase of 2521 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, XTerra 2.5L Titanium (2WD), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. XTerra 2.5L Titanium (2WD) uses Front Wheel Drive, while EcoSport 1.5 Trend uses Front Wheel Drive.