XTerra 2.5L Titanium (2WD) vs EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
/
4
N/A, Electric
2490 cc
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
7 Seater
7 Seater
5 Doors
/
4900 mm
5209
1865 mm
2010
1865 mm
1731
2850 mm
3110
Fuel Economy
78 L
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
Key Spec
2.5 L - 4.0 L
/
165 BHP - 261 BHP
429 BHP - 543 BHP
Automatic
Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Electric
TBD
/
5 Seater - 7 Seater
4 Seater - 7 Seater
/
TBD
/
320 km - 515 km
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
2.5 L
0.0 L
Gasoline
Electric
None
/
4
/
165 BHP
429 BHP
241 Nm
600
Technologies
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
XTerra 2.5L Titanium (2WD)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- Keyless Entry
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Door Edge Protector
- Active Understeer Control (AUC)
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Auto Door Lock
- Spare Wheel
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Lane Departure Warning
Review Comparison
Positive
- Strong off-road performance
- Practical and comfortable interior design
- Wide load capacity
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- Limited technological equipment
- The quality of the cabin materials is average
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickXTerra 2.5L Titanium (2WD)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose XTerra 2.5L Titanium (2WD) if you care more about price; choose EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, XTerra 2.5L Titanium (2WD) has a fuel consumption of No data, while EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, XTerra 2.5L Titanium (2WD) has a wheelbase of 2850 mm, while EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters has a wheelbase of 3110. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. XTerra 2.5L Titanium (2WD) uses Front Wheel Drive, while EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters uses All Wheel Drive.