XTerra 2.5L Titanium (2WD) vs Explorer 2025 Active 200A Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
180
4
4
2490 cc
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
7 Seater
7
5 Doors
/
4900 mm
5049
1865 mm
2004
1865 mm
1775
2850 mm
3025
/
18
/
515
Fuel Economy
78 L
67
/
12.7
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
/
Front Row Seats
/
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
7
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
13.2
/
✓
/
✓
/
6
Transmission
Automatic
10 Speed Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Four-Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
255/65 R18
/
255/65 R18
Key Spec
2.5 L - 4.0 L
2.3 L - 3.5 L
165 BHP - 261 BHP
285 BHP - 400 BHP
Automatic
10 Speed Automatic & 10 Speed Selectshift Automatic & Automatic & CVT
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater - 7 Seater
7 - 7
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
2.5 L
2.3
Gasoline
Gasoline
None
/
4
/
165 BHP
300 BHP
241 Nm
420
/
2.3L EcoBoost L4
Technologies
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
XTerra 2.5L Titanium (2WD)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Explorer 2025 Active 200A
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear AC Controls
- Push Button Start
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Emergency Lane Keeping (ELK）
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Intelligent Emergency Call
- Rollover stability control
- Security System
- Pedestrian airbag
- Crosswind Assist
- Active Understeer Control (AUC)
- Active Bonnet
- Acceleration Skid Control
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Knee Bag - Driver
- Auto Door Lock
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- Strong off-road performance
- Practical and comfortable interior design
- Wide load capacity
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- Limited technological equipment
- The quality of the cabin materials is average
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose XTerra 2.5L Titanium (2WD) if you care more about price; choose Explorer 2025 Active 200A if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, XTerra 2.5L Titanium (2WD) has a fuel consumption of No data, while Explorer 2025 Active 200A has a fuel consumption of 7.87. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, XTerra 2.5L Titanium (2WD) has a wheelbase of 2850 mm, while Explorer 2025 Active 200A has a wheelbase of 3025. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Explorer 2025 Active 200A, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. XTerra 2.5L Titanium (2WD) uses Front Wheel Drive, while Explorer 2025 Active 200A uses Four-Wheel Drive.