XTerra 2.5L Titanium (2WD) vs Max RS Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
/
4
/
2490 cc
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
7 Seater
5
5 Doors
/
4900 mm
4785
1865 mm
1930
1865 mm
1625
2850 mm
2880
/
20"
Fuel Economy
78 L
56
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
✓
Front and Back Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
10.2
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
Infotainment
/
15.6
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
19
Transmission
Automatic
single-speed AT
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Four-Wheel Drive
/
double wishbone suspension
/
multi-link suspension
Key Spec
2.5 L - 4.0 L
/
165 BHP - 261 BHP
/
Automatic
/
Gasoline & Petrol
/
TBD
/
5 Seater - 7 Seater
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
2.5 L
1.5L
Gasoline
Hybrid
None
/
4
/
165 BHP
496 hp
241 Nm
675
/
Turbocharge
/
365
Technologies
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
XTerra 2.5L Titanium (2WD)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Max RS
Review Comparison
Positive
- Strong off-road performance
- Practical and comfortable interior design
- Wide load capacity
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- Limited technological equipment
- The quality of the cabin materials is average
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickMax RS
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose XTerra 2.5L Titanium (2WD) if you care more about overall equipment; choose Max RS if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, XTerra 2.5L Titanium (2WD) has a fuel consumption of No data, while Max RS has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, XTerra 2.5L Titanium (2WD) has a wheelbase of 2850 mm, while Max RS has a wheelbase of 2880. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Max RS , offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. XTerra 2.5L Titanium (2WD) uses Front Wheel Drive, while Max RS uses Four-Wheel Drive.