XUV 500 2.2L W6 (FWD) vs GS4 1.5T GB Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
180 km/h
180 km/h
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4585 mm
4545 mm
1890 mm
1856 mm
1785 mm
1668 mm
2700 mm
2680 mm
96 L
470 L
Fuel Economy
15.4 Km/L
14.7 Km/L
70 L
55 L
15.4 Km/L
14.7 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.2 L
1.5 L - 1.5 L
140 BHP
165 BHP - 248
TBD
8AT
Gasoline
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.2 L
1.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
140 BHP
165 BHP
320 Nm
265 Nm
Comparison of configuration highlights
XUV 500 2.2L W6 (FWD)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
GS4 1.5T GB
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickXUV 500 2.2L W6 (FWD)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose XUV 500 2.2L W6 (FWD) if you care more about price; choose GS4 1.5T GB if you care more about power.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, XUV 500 2.2L W6 (FWD) has a fuel consumption of 6.49, while GS4 1.5T GB has a fuel consumption of 6.8. Therefore, XUV 500 2.2L W6 (FWD) is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, XUV 500 2.2L W6 (FWD) has a wheelbase of 2700 mm, while GS4 1.5T GB has a wheelbase of 2680 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, XUV 500 2.2L W6 (FWD), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. XUV 500 2.2L W6 (FWD) uses Front Wheel Drive, while GS4 1.5T GB uses Front Wheel Drive.