XUV 500 2.2L W6 (FWD) vs Jolion 1.5T Basic Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
180 km/h
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4585 mm
4468 mm
1890 mm
1841 mm
1785 mm
1619 mm
2700 mm
/
96 L
/
Fuel Economy
15.4 Km/L
13.7 Km/L
70 L
55 L
15.4 Km/L
13.7 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Safety
✓
✓
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.2 L
1.5 L
140 BHP
140 BHP - 181 BHP
TBD
Automatic & DCT
Gasoline
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.2 L
1.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
140 BHP
147 BHP
320 Nm
220 Nm
Comparison of configuration highlights
XUV 500 2.2L W6 (FWD)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Jolion 1.5T Basic
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickXUV 500 2.2L W6 (FWD)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose XUV 500 2.2L W6 (FWD) if you care more about price; choose Jolion 1.5T Basic if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, XUV 500 2.2L W6 (FWD) has a fuel consumption of 6.49, while Jolion 1.5T Basic has a fuel consumption of 7.3. Therefore, XUV 500 2.2L W6 (FWD) is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, XUV 500 2.2L W6 (FWD) has a wheelbase of 2700 mm, while Jolion 1.5T Basic has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. XUV 500 2.2L W6 (FWD) uses Front Wheel Drive, while Jolion 1.5T Basic uses Front Wheel Drive.