XUV 500 2.2L W6 (FWD) vs Tiggo 9 Comfort Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
180 km/h
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
7
4585 mm
4810
1890 mm
1925
1785 mm
1742
2700 mm
2800
96 L
/
/
19
Fuel Economy
15.4 Km/L
13
70 L
/
15.4 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
/
Driver Seat
/
10.25
/
✓
/
10.25"
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
✓
/
Triple
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
/
6
/
✓
Infotainment
/
15.6
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
8
Battery/Charging
/
4
Transmission
/
AT
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Drive
Key Spec
2.2 L
-
140 BHP
254 - 254
TBD
AT & Automatic
Gasoline
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
7
Exterior
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.2 L
2.0L
Gasoline
Gasoline
140 BHP
254
320 Nm
390
/
Turbocharge
/
2.0T GDI
Technologies
/
19 ADAS Functions
/
✓
/
✓
/
Eco + Normal + Sport
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
XUV 500 2.2L W6 (FWD)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Tiggo 9 Comfort
- Power Tailgate
- Rear Defogger
- Number of Airbags
- Blind Spot Warning
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickXUV 500 2.2L W6 (FWD)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose XUV 500 2.2L W6 (FWD) if you care more about price; choose Tiggo 9 Comfort if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, XUV 500 2.2L W6 (FWD) has a fuel consumption of 6.49, while Tiggo 9 Comfort has a fuel consumption of 7.69. Therefore, XUV 500 2.2L W6 (FWD) is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, XUV 500 2.2L W6 (FWD) has a wheelbase of 2700 mm, while Tiggo 9 Comfort has a wheelbase of 2800. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Tiggo 9 Comfort, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. XUV 500 2.2L W6 (FWD) uses Front Wheel Drive, while Tiggo 9 Comfort uses Front Drive.