ZNA Rich 2020 2.4L DC (4x2) vs ZNA Rich 2019 2.4L DC (4x2) Comparison
Engine / Motor
160
160
4
4
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
5080
5080
1720
1720
1680
1680
3050
3050
830
830
Fuel Economy
12.7
12.7
60
60
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Interior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Safety
✓
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Transmission
Manual
Manual
Chassis & Steering
Rear Wheel Drive
Rear Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.4 L
2.4 L
217 BHP
217 BHP
Manual
Manual
Petrol
Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Engine
2.4 L
2.4 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
217 BHP
217 BHP
136
136
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
ZNA Rich 2020 2.4L DC (4x2)
- Rear Defogger
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Steering Adjustment
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
ZNA Rich 2019 2.4L DC (4x2)
- Rear Defogger
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Steering Adjustment
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickZNA Rich 2019 2.4L DC (4x2)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose ZNA Rich 2020 2.4L DC (4x2) if you care more about overall equipment; choose ZNA Rich 2019 2.4L DC (4x2) if you care more about overall equipment.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, ZNA Rich 2020 2.4L DC (4x2) has a fuel consumption of 7.87, while ZNA Rich 2019 2.4L DC (4x2) has a fuel consumption of 7.87. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, ZNA Rich 2020 2.4L DC (4x2) has a wheelbase of 3050, while ZNA Rich 2019 2.4L DC (4x2) has a wheelbase of 3050. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. ZNA Rich 2020 2.4L DC (4x2) uses Rear Wheel Drive, while ZNA Rich 2019 2.4L DC (4x2) uses Rear Wheel Drive.