ZNA Rich 2024 ZNA Rich 2024 2.4L DC (4x2) vs DMax 3.0L Crew Cab 4WD GT Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
160
170 km/h
4
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
5.080
5265 mm
1.720
1870 mm
1.680
1785 mm
3.050
3125 mm
830
/
Fuel Economy
12.7
12.5 Km/L
60
72 L
/
12.5 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
Manual
/
Chassis & Steering
Rear Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.4 L
1.9 L - 3.0 L
217 BHP
79 BHP - 190 BHP
Manual
Automatic & Manual
Gasoline
Diesel
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
3 Seater - 5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
2.4 L
3.0 L
Petrol
Diesel
217 BHP
190 BHP
136
450 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
ZNA Rich 2024 ZNA Rich 2024 2.4L DC (4x2)
- Rear Defogger
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Steering Adjustment
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
DMax 3.0L Crew Cab 4WD GT
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickDMax 3.0L Crew Cab 4WD GT
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose ZNA Rich 2024 ZNA Rich 2024 2.4L DC (4x2) if you care more about fuel economy; choose DMax 3.0L Crew Cab 4WD GT if you care more about interior space.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, ZNA Rich 2024 ZNA Rich 2024 2.4L DC (4x2) has a fuel consumption of 7.87, while DMax 3.0L Crew Cab 4WD GT has a fuel consumption of 8. Therefore, ZNA Rich 2024 ZNA Rich 2024 2.4L DC (4x2) is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, ZNA Rich 2024 ZNA Rich 2024 2.4L DC (4x2) has a wheelbase of 3.050, while DMax 3.0L Crew Cab 4WD GT has a wheelbase of 3125 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, DMax 3.0L Crew Cab 4WD GT, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. ZNA Rich 2024 ZNA Rich 2024 2.4L DC (4x2) uses Rear Wheel Drive, while DMax 3.0L Crew Cab 4WD GT uses Four Wheel Drive.