ZR-V EX vs Song Plus Design Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
4
/
/
170
Dimensions
5
5
1488
1790
18 英寸
19
4567
4775
1840
1890
1621
1680
2657
2765
380
574
186
/
/
Flush Door
/
5
Fuel Economy
/
14.5
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Manual
Interior
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
Driver Seat
/
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
LCD
/
Sensatec Leather
/
✓
/
Dual
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
√
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Driver's and Passenger airbags, Front-row side airbag, Integrated side air curtains
/
Front and Rear
/
✓
/
4x Front Sensor, 4x Rear Sensor
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
All Seats
Infotainment
9
15.6-inch rotating screen
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
12
9
✓
DIRAC
Battery/Charging
/
6.6
Transmission
✓
/
CVT
/
Automatic
AT
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Drive
麦弗逊式独立悬挂
MacPherson
多连杆式独立悬挂
Multi- link(5 links)
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
225/55 R18
235/50 R19
225/55 R18
235/50 R19
/
VENTILATED DISC
/
DISC
Key Spec
1.5 L - 1.5 L
1.5 L - 1.5 L
178 BHP - 180
197 BHP - 360 BHP
Automatic & CVT
AT & Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Hybrid
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
1.5
1.5T
Gasoline
Hybrid
Turbocharge
/
1.5L VTEC Turbo
/
有
/
4
/
180
319 BHP
132.4
/
6000
/
240
520
1700-4500
/
直喷
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
√
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Sport, Ordinary, Economical, Sand and Mud Terrain Mode
/
✓
Motor
/
596
/
Lithium iron phosphate battery
/
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
ZR-V EX
- Power Tailgate
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
Song Plus Design
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree Camera
- Keyless Entry
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Steering Adjustment
- Rear Cross Traffic Alert
- Number of Airbags
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Child Lock
- Active braking
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
- Seat belt reminder
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose ZR-V EX if you care more about fuel economy; choose Song Plus Design if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, ZR-V EX has a fuel consumption of 6.06, while Song Plus Design has a fuel consumption of 6.9. Therefore, ZR-V EX is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, ZR-V EX has a wheelbase of 2657, while Song Plus Design has a wheelbase of 2765. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Song Plus Design, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. ZR-V EX uses Front Drive, while Song Plus Design uses Front Drive.