ZRV EX 2025 vs Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
/
4
4
1490 cc
/
GCC
GCC
Dimensions
5
7 Seater
18
/
5 Doors
5 Doors
4567 mm
4950 mm
1839 mm
1930 mm
1621 mm
1730 mm
2654 mm
2850 mm
556 L
/
Fuel Economy
11 Km/L
20 Km/L
50 L
65 L
11 Km/L
20 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
/
✓
Interior
10.2
/
Infotainment
9
/
12
/
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
1.5 L - 1.5 L
2.5 L - 2.5 L
178 BHP - 180
240 - 240
Automatic & CVT
CVT & Electronically controlled Continuously Variable Transmission (ECVT)
Gasoline
Hybrid
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
7 - 7
Engine
In-Line
In-Line
1.5 L
2.5 L
Gasoline
Hybrid
Single Turbo
None
4
4
180 BHP
240 BHP
260 Nm
237 Nm
Exterior
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
ZRV EX 2025
- 360 Degree Camera
Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD)
- Rear Camera
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickHighlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose ZRV EX 2025 if you care more about overall equipment; choose Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) if you care more about fuel economy.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, ZRV EX 2025 has a fuel consumption of 9.09, while Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) has a fuel consumption of 5. Therefore, Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, ZRV EX 2025 has a wheelbase of 2654 mm, while Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) has a wheelbase of 2850 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. ZRV EX 2025 uses Front Wheel Drive, while Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) uses All Wheel Drive.