ZRV EX 2025 vs Tiggo 9 Comfort Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
/
4
/
1490 cc
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
5
7
18
19
5 Doors
/
4567 mm
4810
1839 mm
1925
1621 mm
1742
2654 mm
2800
556 L
/
Fuel Economy
11 Km/L
13
50 L
/
11 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
10.2
10.25"
/
Driver Seat
/
10.25
/
✓
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
✓
/
Triple
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
/
6
/
✓
Infotainment
9
15.6
12
8
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Battery/Charging
/
4
Transmission
Automatic
AT
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Drive
Key Spec
1.5 L - 1.5 L
2.0
178 BHP - 180
254
Automatic & CVT
Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
7
Engine
In-Line
/
1.5 L
2.0L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Single Turbo
/
4
/
180 BHP
254
260 Nm
390
/
Turbocharge
/
2.0T GDI
Exterior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Technologies
/
19 ADAS Functions
/
✓
/
✓
/
Eco + Normal + Sport
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
ZRV EX 2025
- 360 Degree Camera
Tiggo 9 Comfort
- Power Tailgate
- Rear Defogger
- Number of Airbags
- Blind Spot Warning
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickTiggo 9 Comfort
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose ZRV EX 2025 if you care more about overall equipment; choose Tiggo 9 Comfort if you care more about fuel economy.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, ZRV EX 2025 has a fuel consumption of 9.09, while Tiggo 9 Comfort has a fuel consumption of 7.69. Therefore, Tiggo 9 Comfort is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, ZRV EX 2025 has a wheelbase of 2654 mm, while Tiggo 9 Comfort has a wheelbase of 2800. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Tiggo 9 Comfort, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. ZRV EX 2025 uses Front Wheel Drive, while Tiggo 9 Comfort uses Front Drive.