ZS 1.5L STD vs GMC Yukon 2023 5.3 V8 AT4 (AWD) Comparison

Car Information

12.8

/

Engine / Motor

170

/

/

8

Dimensions

5 Seater

7 Seater

1318

/

17

/

5

/

4323

5334

1809

2057

1653

1943

2585

3071

359/1166

/

145

/

Fuel Economy

17.2

/

45

/

Comfort

/

/

Smart Key

/

Manual

/

/

/

Interior

/

Front Row Seats

/

Fabric

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

Drivers and Passenger Airbag

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

10.1

/

/

4

/

/

/

/

/

Transmission

CVT

Automatic

/

Chassis & Steering

Front Drive

All Wheel Drive

McPherson Front Shock Absorber

/

H Torsional Beam

/

Wheels/brakes

Disc

/

Disc

/

215/55 R17

/

215/55 R17

/

Key Spec

1.3 L - 1.5 L

5.3 L - 6.2 L

112 BHP - 168

320 BHP - 420 BHP

6AT & Automatic & CVT

10 SPEED AUTOMATIC & Automatic

Gasoline & Petrol

Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

5 Seater

7 - 9 Seater

Exterior

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

1.5 L

5.3 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

118 BHP

355 BHP

88

/

180

520

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • ZS 1.5L STD

    • Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
    • Push Button Start
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Rear Camera
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Number of Airbags
    • Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
  • GMC Yukon 2023 5.3 V8 AT4 (AWD)

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Push Button Start
    • Keyless Entry
    • Rear Camera
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Active braking
    • Lane Departure Warning

Review Comparison

Positive

  • Modern and attractive exterior design
  • Economical fuel consumption
  • Competitive price compared to specifications

Negative

  • Average interior material quality
  • Engine performance is limited by power
  • The lack of some advanced security systems

Positive

  • Spacious interior space
  • Excellent towing capabilities
  • Advanced entertainment systems

Negative

  • High fuel consumption
  • Their price is relatively high
  • Its large size may be inappropriate for some areas

Related comparisons

Editor's PickZS 1.5L STD

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose ZS 1.5L STD if you care more about price; choose GMC Yukon 2023 5.3 V8 AT4 (AWD) if you care more about interior space.

Popular Car Comparisons

MG | ZS 1.5L STD

VS

Haval | Haval Jolion Basic

MG | ZS 1.5L STD

VS

GAC | GS3 1.3T GB

MG | ZS 1.5L STD

VS

Nissan | Nissan Kicks 2021 1.6 SV

MG | ZS 1.5L STD

VS

Opel | Opel Crossland X 2020 1.2T Enjoy

MG | ZS 1.5L STD

VS

Peugeot | Peugeot 2008 2019 1.6L Active

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, ZS 1.5L STD has a fuel consumption of 5.81, while GMC Yukon 2023 5.3 V8 AT4 (AWD) has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, ZS 1.5L STD has a wheelbase of 2585, while GMC Yukon 2023 5.3 V8 AT4 (AWD) has a wheelbase of 3071. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, GMC Yukon 2023 5.3 V8 AT4 (AWD) , offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. ZS 1.5L STD uses Front Drive, while GMC Yukon 2023 5.3 V8 AT4 (AWD) uses All Wheel Drive.