ZS 1.5L STD vs Honda CR-V 2023 2.4 EX Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
170
200
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
1318
/
17
/
5
/
4323
4550
1809
1820
1653
1680
2585
2620
359/1166
1053
145
/
Fuel Economy
17.2
11.0
45
58
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Smart Key
/
Manual
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
Front Row Seats
✓
Fabric
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
Drivers and Passenger Airbag
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
10.1
/
✓
✓
✓
/
4
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
CVT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
All Wheel Drive
McPherson Front Shock Absorber
/
H Torsional Beam
/
Wheels/brakes
Disc
/
Disc
/
215/55 R17
/
215/55 R17
/
/
✓
Key Spec
1.3 L - 1.5 L
1.5 L - 2.4 L
112 BHP - 168
184 BHP - 190
6AT & Automatic & CVT
Automatic & CVT
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 Seater - 7
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
2.4 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
118 BHP
188 BHP
88
/
180
222
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
ZS 1.5L STD
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Push Button Start
- Parking sensor rear
- Rear Camera
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Number of Airbags
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
Honda CR-V 2023 2.4 EX
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Keyless Entry
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Economical fuel consumption
- Competitive price compared to specifications
Negative
- Average interior material quality
- Engine performance is limited by power
- The lack of some advanced security systems
Positive
- High reliability and durable performance
- A wide range of security technologies
- Excellent fuel efficiency
Negative
- The price is higher than some competitors
- Lack of hybrid drive options in some markets
- Limited charging capacity compared to some competitors
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose ZS 1.5L STD if you care more about fuel economy; choose Honda CR-V 2023 2.4 EX if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, ZS 1.5L STD has a fuel consumption of 5.81, while Honda CR-V 2023 2.4 EX has a fuel consumption of 9.09. Therefore, ZS 1.5L STD is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, ZS 1.5L STD has a wheelbase of 2585, while Honda CR-V 2023 2.4 EX has a wheelbase of 2620. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Honda CR-V 2023 2.4 EX, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. ZS 1.5L STD uses Front Drive, while Honda CR-V 2023 2.4 EX uses All Wheel Drive.