ZS 1.5L STD vs MG ZS 2020 1.5L STD Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
170
170
/
4
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
1318
/
17
✓
5
/
4323
4.314
1809
1.809
1653
1.624
2585
2.585
359/1166
448
145
/
Fuel Economy
17.2
17.2
45
48
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Key
/
Manual
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
Front Row Seats
✓
Fabric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
Drivers and Passenger Airbag
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
10.1
/
✓
✓
✓
/
4
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
CVT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Wheel Drive
McPherson Front Shock Absorber
/
H Torsional Beam
/
Wheels/brakes
Disc
/
Disc
/
215/55 R17
/
215/55 R17
/
Key Spec
1.3 L - 1.5 L
1.3 L - 1.5 L
112 BHP - 168
112 BHP - 168
6AT & Automatic & CVT
6AT & Automatic & CVT
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
1.5 L
Gasoline
Petrol
118 BHP
112 BHP
88
/
180
150
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
ZS 1.5L STD
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Push Button Start
- Parking sensor rear
- Rear Camera
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Number of Airbags
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
MG ZS 2020 1.5L STD
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Push Button Start
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Steering Adjustment
- Number of Airbags
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Economical fuel consumption
- Competitive price compared to specifications
Negative
- Average interior material quality
- Engine performance is limited by power
- The lack of some advanced security systems
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Economical fuel consumption
- Competitive price compared to specifications
Negative
- Average interior material quality
- Engine performance is limited by power
- The lack of some advanced security systems
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose ZS 1.5L STD if you care more about interior space; choose MG ZS 2020 1.5L STD if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, ZS 1.5L STD has a fuel consumption of 5.81, while MG ZS 2020 1.5L STD has a fuel consumption of 5.81. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, ZS 1.5L STD has a wheelbase of 2585, while MG ZS 2020 1.5L STD has a wheelbase of 2.585. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, ZS 1.5L STD, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. ZS 1.5L STD uses Front Drive, while MG ZS 2020 1.5L STD uses Front Wheel Drive.