ZS 1.5L STD vs Chery Tiggo 4 Pro 2023 1.5L Comfort Comparison
Car Information
/
12.8
/
Engine / Motor
170
180
/
4
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
1318
/
17
/
5
/
4323
4.318
1809
1.83
1653
1.67
2585
/
359/1166
340
145
/
Fuel Economy
17.2
/
45
51
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Smart Key
/
Manual
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
Fabric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
Drivers and Passenger Airbag
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
10.1
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
4
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
CVT
CVT
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Wheel Drive
McPherson Front Shock Absorber
/
H Torsional Beam
/
/
✓
/
✓
Wheels/brakes
Disc
/
Disc
/
215/55 R17
/
215/55 R17
/
/
✓
Key Spec
1.3 L - 1.5 L
1.5 L - 1.5 L
112 BHP - 168
111 BHP - 156
6AT & Automatic & CVT
Automatic & CVT
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
LED
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
1.5 L
Gasoline
Petrol
118 BHP
113 BHP
88
/
180
143
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
ZS 1.5L STD
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Push Button Start
- Parking sensor rear
- Rear Camera
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Number of Airbags
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
Chery Tiggo 4 Pro 2023 1.5L Comfort
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Collision Detection
- Auto Door Lock
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Economical fuel consumption
- Competitive price compared to specifications
Negative
- Average interior material quality
- Engine performance is limited by power
- The lack of some advanced security systems
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose ZS 1.5L STD if you care more about price; choose Chery Tiggo 4 Pro 2023 1.5L Comfort if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, ZS 1.5L STD has a fuel consumption of 5.81, while Chery Tiggo 4 Pro 2023 1.5L Comfort has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, ZS 1.5L STD has a wheelbase of 2585, while Chery Tiggo 4 Pro 2023 1.5L Comfort has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. ZS 1.5L STD uses Front Drive, while Chery Tiggo 4 Pro 2023 1.5L Comfort uses Front Wheel Drive.