ZS 1.5L STD vs X35 1.5L CVT Luxury Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
170
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
1318
1340
17
17
5
/
4323
4286
1809
1815
1653
1665
2585
2560
359/1166
390
145
180
/
1765
Fuel Economy
17.2
/
45
46
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Smart Key
/
Manual
/
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
Front Row Seats
Front Row Seats
Fabric
Leather Fabric Mixed Seats
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Driver
Safety
Drivers and Passenger Airbag
Driver And Passenger Airbag.Side Airbag.
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
T125/80 R15
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Front
Infotainment
10.1
/
✓
✓
✓
/
4
6
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
CVT
CVT
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Drive
McPherson Front Shock Absorber
MacPhersan
H Torsional Beam
H torsion beam type
Wheels/brakes
Disc
/
Disc
Solid Disc
215/55 R17
215/50 R17
215/55 R17
215/50 R17
/
✓
Key Spec
1.3 L - 1.5 L
1.5 L - 1.5 L
112 BHP - 168
114 BHP - 150
6AT & Automatic & CVT
6MT & Automatic & CVT & CVT
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
1.5
Gasoline
Gasoline
118 BHP
134
88
/
180
210
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
ZS 1.5L STD
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Push Button Start
- Parking sensor rear
- Rear Camera
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Number of Airbags
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
X35 1.5L CVT Luxury
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Push Button Start
- Parking sensor rear
- Rear Camera
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Spare Wheel
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Seat belt reminder
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Economical fuel consumption
- Competitive price compared to specifications
Negative
- Average interior material quality
- Engine performance is limited by power
- The lack of some advanced security systems
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose ZS 1.5L STD if you care more about price; choose X35 1.5L CVT Luxury if you care more about power.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, ZS 1.5L STD has a fuel consumption of 5.81, while X35 1.5L CVT Luxury has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, ZS 1.5L STD has a wheelbase of 2585, while X35 1.5L CVT Luxury has a wheelbase of 2560. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, ZS 1.5L STD, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. ZS 1.5L STD uses Front Drive, while X35 1.5L CVT Luxury uses Front Drive.