ZS 1.5T LUX 2026 vs Mazda CX3 2020 2.0L GT (FWD) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
170
190
/
4
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
1318
/
18
/
5
/
4430
4.275
1818
1.765
1635
1.535
2610
2.570
359/1166
240
145
/
Fuel Economy
15.9
15.4
45
48
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Key
/
Manual
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
Passenger Seat
/
Leather
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
Drivers and Passenger Airbag Side Airbags
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
10.1
/
✓
/
✓
/
6
/
/
✓
Transmission
CVT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
All Wheel Drive
McPherson Front Shock Absorber
/
H Torsional Beam
/
Wheels/brakes
Disc
/
Disc
/
215/55 R17
/
215/55 R17
/
Key Spec
1.3 L - 1.5 L
2.0 L - 2.0 L
112 BHP - 168
145 BHP - 148 BHP
6AT & Automatic & CVT
6 Speed SkyActiv with Sports Mode & Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
LED
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Petrol
168
148 BHP
88
/
180
192
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Motor
/
N/A
Comparison of configuration highlights
ZS 1.5T LUX 2026
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- 360 Degree Camera
- Push Button Start
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Number of Airbags
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
Mazda CX3 2020 2.0L GT (FWD)
- Keyless Entry
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Economical fuel consumption
- Competitive price compared to specifications
Negative
- Average interior material quality
- Engine performance is limited by power
- The lack of some advanced security systems
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose ZS 1.5T LUX 2026 if you care more about price; choose Mazda CX3 2020 2.0L GT (FWD) if you care more about power.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, ZS 1.5T LUX 2026 has a fuel consumption of 6.29, while Mazda CX3 2020 2.0L GT (FWD) has a fuel consumption of 6.49. Therefore, ZS 1.5T LUX 2026 is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, ZS 1.5T LUX 2026 has a wheelbase of 2610, while Mazda CX3 2020 2.0L GT (FWD) has a wheelbase of 2.570. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, ZS 1.5T LUX 2026, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. ZS 1.5T LUX 2026 uses Front Drive, while Mazda CX3 2020 2.0L GT (FWD) uses All Wheel Drive.