ZS 1.5T LUX 2026 vs T2 i-DM Comparison

Car Information

12.8

/

Engine / Motor

170

200

/

4

/

Chinese

Dimensions

5 Seater

5

1318

/

18

/

5

5

4430

4785

1818

2006

1635

1875

2610

2800

359/1166

752

145

220

Fuel Economy

15.9

18.5

45

70 L

Comfort

/

/

/

Smart Key

Smart Entry

Manual

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

Driver Seat

/

/

Front Row Seats

Passenger Seat

/

Leather

Leather

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Digital

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

Standard

Safety

Drivers and Passenger Airbag Side Airbags

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

10.1

15.6

/

/

6

12

/

/

/

/

Android LCD

/

Transmission

CVT

DHT

Chassis & Steering

Front Drive

Four Wheel Drive

McPherson Front Shock Absorber

/

H Torsional Beam

/

Wheels/brakes

Disc

/

Disc

/

215/55 R17

/

215/55 R17

/

Key Spec

1.3 L - 1.5 L

1.5

112 BHP - 168

154 BHP - 600

6AT & Automatic & CVT

3DHT & DHT

Gasoline & Petrol

Hybrid

TBD

TBD

5 Seater

5

Exterior

/

/

/

/

LED

LED

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

1.5 L

1.5

Gasoline

Hybrid

168

154 BHP

88

/

180

220

/

In-Line

/

4

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • ZS 1.5T LUX 2026

    • Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
    • 360 Degree Camera
    • Push Button Start
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Number of Airbags
    • Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
  • T2 i-DM

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear Power Outlet
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • Modern and attractive exterior design
  • Economical fuel consumption
  • Competitive price compared to specifications

Negative

  • Average interior material quality
  • Engine performance is limited by power
  • The lack of some advanced security systems

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickT2 i-DM

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose ZS 1.5T LUX 2026 if you care more about overall equipment; choose T2 i-DM if you care more about price.

Popular Car Comparisons

MG | ZS 1.5T LUX 2026

VS

Changan | CS35 Plus Limited

MG | ZS 1.5T LUX 2026

VS

Kia | Kia Seltos 2021 1.6L

MG | ZS 1.5T LUX 2026

VS

Kia | Kia Seltos 2020 1.6L

MG | ZS 1.5T LUX 2026

VS

Chery | Chery Tiggo 4 Pro 2024 1.5L Luxury

MG | ZS 1.5T LUX 2026

VS

Chery | Chery Tiggo 4 Pro 2023 1.5L Luxury

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, ZS 1.5T LUX 2026 has a fuel consumption of 6.29, while T2 i-DM has a fuel consumption of 5.41. Therefore, T2 i-DM is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, ZS 1.5T LUX 2026 has a wheelbase of 2610, while T2 i-DM has a wheelbase of 2800. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, T2 i-DM, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. ZS 1.5T LUX 2026 uses Front Drive, while T2 i-DM uses Four Wheel Drive.