ZS 1.5T LUX 2026 vs Tiggo 2 Pro Comfort Comparison
Car Information
/
12.8
/
Engine / Motor
170
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
1318
/
18
16
5
5
4430
4200
1818
1760
1635
1570
2610
2555
359/1166
341
145
/
/
Flush Door
Fuel Economy
15.9
/
45
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
Smart Key
/
Manual
Manual
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
Passenger Seat
Front Row Seats
Leather
Cloth
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
Drivers and Passenger Airbag Side Airbags
Dual Front Airbags
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
10.1
10.25
✓
✓
✓
✓
6
4
/
✓
Transmission
CVT
CVT
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Drive
McPherson Front Shock Absorber
/
H Torsional Beam
/
Wheels/brakes
Disc
/
Disc
/
215/55 R17
215/60 R17
215/55 R17
215/60 R17
Key Spec
1.3 L - 1.5 L
1.5 L - 1.5 L
112 BHP - 168
109 BHP - 113
6AT & Automatic & CVT
Automatic & CVT
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
1.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
168
111 BHP
88
/
180
/
/
1.5L
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
ECO, Normal
Comparison of configuration highlights
ZS 1.5T LUX 2026
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- 360 Degree Camera
- Push Button Start
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Number of Airbags
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
Tiggo 2 Pro Comfort
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Keyless Start
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Economical fuel consumption
- Competitive price compared to specifications
Negative
- Average interior material quality
- Engine performance is limited by power
- The lack of some advanced security systems
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose ZS 1.5T LUX 2026 if you care more about interior space; choose Tiggo 2 Pro Comfort if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, ZS 1.5T LUX 2026 has a fuel consumption of 6.29, while Tiggo 2 Pro Comfort has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, ZS 1.5T LUX 2026 has a wheelbase of 2610, while Tiggo 2 Pro Comfort has a wheelbase of 2555. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, ZS 1.5T LUX 2026, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. ZS 1.5T LUX 2026 uses Front Drive, while Tiggo 2 Pro Comfort uses Front Drive.