Isuzu MU X 2024 3.0T AWD LS vs Mazda CX9 2019 2.5L Luxury (AWD) Comparison

Car Information

/

Engine / Motor

4

N/A

Dimensions

7 Seater

7 Seater

4.850

5.075

1.870

1.969

1.875

1.716

2.855

2.930

235

/

Fuel Economy

80

74

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Transmission

Automatic

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

/

/

All Wheel Drive

All Wheel Drive

/

Wheels/brakes

/

Key Spec

2.5 L - 3.0 L

2.5 L - 3.7 L

136 BHP - 190 BHP

226 BHP - 273 BHP

Automatic & Manual

Automatic

Diesel & Petrol

Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

7 - 7

7 Seater

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

3.0 L

2.5 L

Diesel

Petrol

190 BHP

226 BHP

450

420

Technologies

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Isuzu MU X 2024 3.0T AWD LS

    • Number of Airbags
    • Pedestrian airbag
    • Fire Extinguisher
    • Collision Detection
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
  • Mazda CX9 2019 2.5L Luxury (AWD)

    • Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
    • Push Button Start
    • Keyless Entry
    • Rear Camera
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Number of Airbags
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Active braking
    • Lane Departure Warning

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickMazda CX9 2019 2.5L Luxury (AWD)

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Isuzu MU X 2024 3.0T AWD LS if you care more about overall equipment; choose Mazda CX9 2019 2.5L Luxury (AWD) if you care more about interior space.

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Isuzu MU X 2024 3.0T AWD LS has a fuel consumption of No data, while Mazda CX9 2019 2.5L Luxury (AWD) has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Isuzu MU X 2024 3.0T AWD LS has a wheelbase of 2.855, while Mazda CX9 2019 2.5L Luxury (AWD) has a wheelbase of 2.930. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Mazda CX9 2019 2.5L Luxury (AWD), offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Isuzu MU X 2024 3.0T AWD LS uses All Wheel Drive, while Mazda CX9 2019 2.5L Luxury (AWD) uses All Wheel Drive.